back to menu

Contests

  • Debit versus Credit is sponsoring its first ever contest and will be giving away gas cards and a personal finance book. You have five chances to enter. To discover them please check out Happy Birthday to Debit versus Credit.
  • Please note that in order to be eligible to win you MUST leave a comment at the end of the post and let me know which entries you are eligible for!

The Bailout of Fannie and Freddie: Redux

October 2, 2008 | Filed in: Miscellaneous | 5 comments

If you like this post then please consider subscribing to my RSS feed. You can also Subscribe to Debit versus Credit by Email and have new posts sent directly to your inbox.

You may remember the post I published a month ago which was about the government bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and what it might mean to us as the American people.  I haven’t made it a habit to revisit old posts often because a large amount of my content is focused more on timeless financial advice.  However while I was reading back through some of my old content today this post caught my eye and I thought it might be fun to revisit it, especially on a day where our government may pass an extraordinarily large bailout package to prop up the U.S. financial system.

Expect To Pay More In Taxes

The first point that I made was in reference to the sheer size of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and how taxpayers are likely to be ultimately responsible for any losses taken on by our government with the privatization of these two mortgage giants!  Here’s what I said in early September:

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are HUGE companies. They alone service over half of the mortgages in the U.S. They have trillions of dollars worth of liabilities as well. In fact according to the former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, William Poole, they have up to $6 trillion dollars in liabilities (as reported by the Wall Street Journal Online). He believes that it would not be unreasonable to assume that they may end up taking a loss on as much as 5% of their loan portfolio which would provide taxpayers a burden of some $300 billion dollars.

Unfortunately it’s much too soon to make any educated assumptions about how well I did (or rather Mr. Poole did) on this prediction.  I’m going to stand by Mr. Poole and agree with him that Fannie and Freddie are likely to end up taking a loss of at least 5% on their current loan portfolio.  The problems in the housing market haven’t hit rock bottom yet and this will lead to an increased number of foreclosures and, therefore, bad loans.

Mortgage Rates May Finally Drop

The second point I made was in reference to mortgage rates at the time and the likelihood that they were going to drop.  Here’s what I said last month:

The rising level of defaults on mortgages over the past year or two has forced Fannie and Freddie to get more defensive and stop buying up so many mortgages. This has led to an increased risk for mortgage originators, as they might not be able to sell off their risky loans. It has also decreased the amount of cash flowing through the mortgage market and as such has had a strong effect on mortgage rates. Because of the increased risk and the limited capital mortgage lenders have been forced to raise mortgage rates and keep them high. Now that the U.S. has virtually guaranteed the success and liquidity of Fannie and Freddie mortgage originators are likely to have a less difficult time securing cash and selling off their loans. This should lead to a drop in mortgage rates over the next six months or so.

Six months may have been too conservative an estimate.  Mortgage rates actually dropped almost overnight, by about half a percent.  They’re still hovering around six percent (which is what they dropped to after the Fannie and Freddie takeover) and are likely to stay there for a while longer.

Start Investing Now If You Haven’t Already

We’re really starting to get to the meat of this stuff now.  It’s interesting how right after this bailout investors were sure that things were finally starting to get better.  Check out what I had to say then, paying special attention to the bold text:

The markets rebounded on Monday with the Dow Jones Industrial Average ending up almost 300 points (or 2.59%). Investors are excited about the future now that they don’t have to worry about Fannie and Freddie. If the Treasury Department and Paulson are right (and I personally doubt they are) then this bailout should fix everything. After all the housing market is the primary cause of the “recession” that we are currently facing. By shoring up the two largest mortgage companies and providing much-needed capital to the mortgage industry they’re hoping to end this downturn once and for all. Things aren’t quite that black and white however but we’ll come back to that in the next section. In the meantime for the purposes of investing they (the feds) may be right about one thing. By taking over Fannie and Freddie they should increase investor confidence and lower mortgage rates. This should have the effect of a declining bear market if not the return to a bull market.

The heading to this point was the same as the heading above… a recommendation to begin investing.  Considering that it’s nearly impossible to time the markets right, I’m fairly confident that if someone had taken $1,000 dollars and put it into an index fund it would be a great time to start investing.  Sure we’ve had some ups and downs over the past month but overall the markets have been trading mostly sideways since then.  Truthfully in my opinion no time is better than the present to begin investing.  If you haven’t done so yet, then why not start now?

I want to concentrate on the bold point in the quoted paragraph above.  As you can see I predicted that the bailout of Fannie and Freddie would NOT fix the markets like Paulson and the Treasury were predicting.  In fact they were far from right on this point, as if any of us need to be reminded that the government is most likely going to be investing around $700 billion dollars in the financial system over the next several weeks.  I said it here first folks, the Fannie and Freddie takeover would not fix our problems - ready for another one?  Neither will this $700 billion bailout.  It’ll help, there’s no denying that - at least not in the short term.  However it’s not going to fix things overnight, or even over the course of several months.  We still have an underlying problem that is directly related to an OVERSUPPLY of housing in the U.S.  There just aren’t enough potential homeowners to fill all of the houses.

The Financial System Is Nowhere Near A Full Recovery

It’s important to remember that this financial turmoil that our economy is facing was not created overnight and it won’t be fixed overnight either, no matter how hard Bernanke, Paulson and Washington try.

It is true that the primary cause of the economic turmoil that the U.S. is currently facing is due to the uncertainty in the mortgage markets. It’s also true that the decreased cash flowing into these markets due to Fannie and Freddie’s cutbacks was having a negative affect on the entire market. However one would have to be naive to assume that by taking over Fannie and Freddie and providing capital to the mortgage markets that this mess will clean up quickly. The fact is that homeowners are not walking away from their houses because their mortgage lender was unable to sell their mortgage to Fannie - they are walking away because they are upside down on their houses they are unable to afford the payments. Losses will continue to come. The process may be slowed down and stopped sooner than it might have without this bailout (due to the increased affordability of purchasing a home) but unfortunately home values have not reached their lows, as most would-be homeowners are not ready to jump into the market even with today’s home prices!

The fact is that homes are STILL unaffordable in many markets across the U.S. Homeowners are losing money and are bailing ship which is slowly decreasing home prices but we still have quite a ways to go before the buyers start to line up. Bailout out Fannie and Freddie may help some, but as I stated already, the financial system is nowhere near a full recovery.

The point is that we’ve got to be patient and focus on the future and not so much the present.  Things will get better - they always do - but in the meantime it’d be smart of us to take advantage the great investing opportunities that this bear market is providing.  But be smart and don’t rush into anything without some good research.  Good luck out there!

Tags: , , , , ,

Digg This     | Stumble it     |

5 Reasons We Don’t Need No Stinking Bailout

September 24, 2008 | Filed in: Miscellaneous | 7 comments

A wise man once said, “with great power comes great responsibility.”  Whether you are into Spider Man or not it’s hard to ignore such a profound statement, especially when the U.S. is facing times of great turmoil and our nations’ leaders are asking for unprecedented levels of power in order to shore up the financial system.

You may not realize it but the fate of our economy is essentially in a small number of hands right now, the most significant being Henry Paulson and Ben Bernanke.  These two men are pushing to pass a bill in Congress that will give the Department of the Treasury the power to form an entity that will be responsible for buying troubled assets from banks and other financial institutions.  By doing so they hope to free these financial institutions from their troubles and allow the banking system to continue to pump money into the struggling economy.  With a price tag of around $700 billion dollars this would be the mother of all government bailouts.

The question is, do we really need such an enormous bailout?  I’m of the opinion that we don’t and I’ll list for you here 5 reasons why we don’t.

1.  The big banks are hurting, but how realistic is it that they ALL fail?

Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Chase.  What do these banks all have in common?  They are some of the largest financial institutions in the United States.  They also all seem to have the cash to survive this credit crunch that we’re in.  If this bailout doesn’t pass we’re likely to lose some more banks.  Maybe not to bankruptcy, but there will be consolidation for sure.  Washington Mutual is in a shaky condition and may not be around in its current form a few years from now.  However to assume that without this bailout all banks are going to fail is completely preposterous.  That’s highly unlikely to happen, at least at this point.

2.  Most regional and local banks and credit unions are still in good condition.

The authorities seem to forget that the BofA’s and the WaMu’s of the world are not the only banks here in the U.S.  There is a huge system of credit unions and regional/local banks that have a huge marketshare of the available money here.  These banks and credit unions are often in much better conditions than their larger and national counterparts.  Sure a lot of the bank failures this year have been with these smaller banks, but it’s important to remember that the ones who took the most risks have failed and been absorbed already.  More is likely on the way, but overall these financial institutions have largely avoided the risky mortgage mess.

3.  Under the right (or wrong) circumstances such a large bailout could devastate the American Dollar.

The dollar has recovered a lot over the past few months.  The price of oil and other commodities is lower now than it was just a few months ago.  However this bailout will put a huge strain on the dollar because the government doesn’t have the cash just sitting around in a vault.  They’ll have to print money and they’ll have to sell debt.  This will put a lot of pressure on the dollar and unless other competing foreign economies collapse (the Euro zone, etc) the dollar will be heading lower.  This means we’ll be facing higher prices and increased inflation, as if it wasn’t bad enough already.

4.  It reeks of socialism.

A bailout of this magnitude reeks of socialism.  We’ll essentially be privatizing the mortgage asset industry and putting it completely under government control.  Now last time I checked we lived in nation that’s against socialism and for democracy and a market economy.  This bailout is exactly what we’ve fought so hard against since the founding of our great nation.

5.  The economy will eventually correct itself, without such drastic intervention.

I believe in the power of a free market.  I think that we’re facing a recession and things might be difficult for the next year or so.  However the economy always corrects itself and things always get better.  It’s a completely natural phenomena to have good years and bad years.  Why don’t we let things sort themselves out as they should?  If Mr. Greenspan would have done that earlier in the century we likely would not be facing this problem today.  Let the economy correct itself so we don’t risk making things worse somewhere down the line.

Henry Paulson and Ben Bernanke are asking for great power.  I am concerned about the level of responsibility being placed upon them.  I don’t think that they are acting in the best long-term interest of our country by promoting this bailout.  Therefore I don’t trust them to have such great power and great responsibility.  My advice is to let things work out naturally, just like they always have a tendancy to do.  What are your thoughts on the matter?  Are you for or against the bailout?

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Digg This     | Stumble it     |

The End of the World As We Know It: National Bankruptcy!

September 19, 2008 | Filed in: Debt, Miscellaneous | 6 comments

If you had to take a close look at the U.S. markets and the financial system and give an estimate on the absolute worst-case scenario for our economy, what would you predict?

Martin Hennecke, senior manager of private clients at Tyche, has done just that and he has publicly declared that he believes that the U.S. government will be forced to declare bankcruptcy due to all of the private-sector bailouts that they have been sponsoring.  I saw this article over at CNBC and thought that it was interesting and something that I would like to cover.

I’ll quote the highlights of the article here, but you should definitely read it and see what Mr. Hennecke has to say on the matter.  There is also a video attached where they interview him, which is a pretty decent way to blow eight minutes.  I’d like to point out that although Mr. Hennecke doesn’t say so (he may not even believe so) what he’s proposing is more or less a worst-case-scenario.  More on that later.  I’ll begin with his first major (and the biggest) point.

“We expect a depression in the United States. We expect a depression, very possibly, also in Europe,” Hennecke said on “Worldwide Exchange.”

We may not even be officially in a recession (at least by the dictionary definition) but Mr. Hennecke believes that the U.S. and Europe are going to face an actual depression.  He believes that the United States Government will have to accounce a National Bankruptcy as they will not be able to afford the bailouts that they have promised.  For those unaware the government is planning a new bailout, this time to bailout literally every institution having issues with solvency due to mortgage-backed securities.  They plan to purchase these securities for pennies on the dollar, thereby ending any crises related to solvency.  It’s important to note, however, that this article was posted on the 11th of September.  Which means that the last bailout that had been made at the time of publishing was the Fannie and the Freddie bailout.  Since then we’ve invested $85 billion in AIG to bail them out as well.

When the government can no longer pass the United States’ “immense debt” on to taxpayers, it will turn to the holders of U.S. dollars, leading to the eventual downfall of the currency, Hennecke said.

It’d be stupid to pretend that the U.S. is not facing huge debt levels.  In fact we’re close to $10 trillion at this point.  You can see for yourself at the U.S. National Debt Clock.  Things aren’t looking well at all when it comes to the health of our U.S. government.  The problem with this extreme level of debt, and the reasoning behind Hennecke’s predicted depression, is that the U.S. will be forced to print billions of dollars of cash in order to cover the debt and the interest.  He believes that this will lead to HUGE inflation levels which of course will have devastating effects on the American people.

I don’t necessarily think that we’ll ever get to this extreme of a crisis here in the U.S., but it’s worth thinking about.  Just in case something like this ever did happen it wouldn’t be a bad idea to have some money invested in something that wouldn’t be devastated by hyperinflation and depression in the U.S.  If you follow what Mr. Hennecke is doing then you would want to invest in Asian countries, especially China.  He also recommends investing in Gold, as it is a natural hedge against inflation.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Digg This     | Stumble it     |

1 2 Next Page »